Syntax: use -, and, or, -> for propositional operators , true and false for ⊤ and ⊥ , < for comparativity plausibility operator and low capital letters for propositional symbols. You can also use ( and ) as well.
Example: (a < a or b) or (b < a or b)
Here you will get the result of the computation.
Your formula is syntactically incorrect or contains not valid characters. Remember to use low capital letters for propositional symbols!
tuCLEVER hasn't managed to prove your formula within the time limit of 10 seconds.
Do you want to know more about these logics? Take a look at this paper .
Logic | Hilbert-style sytem | Universal sphere model's peculiarities |
---|---|---|
VTU | CPR,CPA,TR,CO,N,T,U1,U2 | - |
VWU | CPR,CPA,TR,CO,N,T,U1,U2,W | weak centering |
VCU | CPR,CPA,TR,CO,N,T,U1,U2,W,C | centering |
VTA | CPR,CPA,TR,CO,N,T,U1,U2,A1,A2 | absoluteness |
VWA | CPR,CPA,TR,CO,N,T,U1,U2,W,A1,A2 | absoluteness + weak centering |
VCA | CPR,CPA,TR,CO,N,T,U1,U2,W,C,A1,A2 | absoluteness + centering |
If a formula F is valid in a conditional logic L, then tuCLEVER is able to generate a .tex file containing the proof tree of ⇒ F in hypersequent calculus SHiL.
You need bussproofs.sty to compile the resulted .tex file.
Type of test | Source code |
---|---|
experiment 1 | source |
experiment 2 | source |
experiment 3 | source |
experiment 4 | source |
We have done several kind of experiments. We have tested tuCLEVER
The performances of tuCLEVER are promising and consistent with theorical expectations: in fact, hypersequent calculi SHiL provide non-optimal decision procedures for VTU and its extensions. In this respect, it is known that deciding satisfiability for conditional formulas in Lewis' logics with uniformity is EXPTIME-complete.
Aix Marseille University, France
Technische Universität Wien, Austria
Aix Marseille University, France
Università di Torino, Italia
Università di Torino, Italia